It is argued in this paper that national language capacity (NLC), with national foreign language capacity as its core component, is the foundation of national competitiveness. Our current national strategy calls for a structural reform of foreign language education, which is supposedly oriented to building NLC, in respect of minimizing low-quality repetition of foreign language teaching and adding strongly or potentially needed strategic (critical) languages to the repertoire of language fields.Diversifying foreign language education contributes to the elimination of unbalance of language fields and teaching quality of these languages, making it possible to meet the varied needs of foreign languages and to mobilize the whole society in building NLC.
戴曼纯,李艳红. 论基于国家语言能力建设的外语规划[J]. 语言战略研究, 2018, 3(5): 32-39.
Dai Manchun and Li Yanhong. On Foreign Language Planning Oriented to Boosting National Language Capacity. , 2018, 3(5): 32-39.
Brecht, Richard and Ronald Walton. 1993. National strategic planning in the less commonly taught languages. NFLC Occasional Paper.
British Council. 2013. Languages for the future: Which languages the UK needs most and why. https://www.britishcouncil.org/organisation/policy-insight-research/research/languages-future.
British Council. 2017. Languages for the future: The foreign languages the United Kingdom needs to become a truly global nation.
Brown, Keith and Sarah Ogilvie. 2009. Concise Encyclopedia of the Languages of the World. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
Goldberg, David, Dennis Looney, and Natalia Lusin. 2015. Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, fall 2013. Modern Language
Association of America.
Lambert, Richard. 1994. Problems and processes in U. S. foreign language planning. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 532, 47-58.
Wei Rining and Su Jinzhi. 2012. The statistics of English in China. English Today 28(3), 10-14.