厦门市中小学生口语能力实证研究

杜晶晶,银晴,宋倩

语言战略研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5) : 66-76.

欢迎访问《语言战略研究》官方网站!今天是
语言战略研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (5) : 66-76. DOI: 10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180506
语言战略研究

厦门市中小学生口语能力实证研究

  • 杜晶晶,银晴,宋倩
作者信息 +

Empirical Research of Xiamen Primary and Middle School Students’ Speaking Proficiency

  • Du Jingjing, Yin Qing and Song Qian
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文从中小学生口语能力实态调查出发,通过描写中小学生口语能力词汇、语法和修辞3 个项目指标的量化特点,以纵向学段与横向学区两个角度呈现厦门市中小学生口语能力的实际情况。纵向学段,中小学生各项指标均呈现随学段、年龄、思维变化而阶段化发展的特点,中学生各项指标发展幅度要大于小学生;横向学区,城市学区的小学生其口语能力在表达形式上、表达意愿上强于城乡结合、乡镇学区,而后二者则较少出现语法问题。在此基础上本文提出口语能力的培养要求应体现表层与深层的两层设计、建立核心量化指标与辅助性指标两点建议。

Abstract

This is a corpus driven study with an aim to assess and describe the oral skills in practical settings of primary and secondary school students in Xiamen. Based on literature review of previous studies on oral proficiency carried out by both Chinese and international researchers, three indicators of vocabulary, grammar and rhetorics are selected and quantified for evaluation purposes. To find out the developing patterns of oral skills, comparison is made across different grades and schools located in different areas. The findings show gradual development features in oral proficiency development, that is, their oral proficiency develops along with ages, cognition and schooling years when they go from lower grades to higher grades, and the development is demonstrated in all three indicators of vocabulary size, grammatical competence and the application of rhetorical devices. In other words, the developing scale for secondary students advances faster than their primary counterparts in all three indexes.Geographically, the performance of students living in urban districts shows stronger than those living in small towns and rural areas, including such aspects as expression strategy and willingness to communicate. Due to the lower motivation in willingness to communicate, fewer grammatical problems were observed among the students from rural and small town schools. Based on the empirical evidence, two suggestions are proposed: first, the training of speaking proficiency should distinguish the surface and the deep layers, whereas the former refers to linguistic forms such as vocabulary and syntax, the latter is about semantics; second, there is a need to establish both core quantitative criteria and auxiliary criteria.

关键词

口语能力 / 中小学生 / 实证研究

Key words

speaking proficiency / primary and secondary school students / empirical study

引用本文

导出引用
杜晶晶,银晴,宋倩. 厦门市中小学生口语能力实证研究[J]. 语言战略研究. 2018, 3(5): 66-76 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180506
Du Jingjing, Yin Qing and Song Qian. Empirical Research of Xiamen Primary and Middle School Students’ Speaking Proficiency[J]. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning. 2018, 3(5): 66-76 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180506

参考文献

丁 炜 2002 《关于小学语文口语交际教学现状的调查》,《上海教育科研》第10 期。
胡 瑛 2006 《小学语文口语交际能力评价指标体系的构建》,《教育导刊》第8 期。
黄伯荣,廖序东 2007 《现代汉语》,北京:高等教育出版社。
刘凤兰 2017 《基于立体多维分段模式培养中学生口语表达的策略》,《教育理论与实践》第8 期。
田良臣 2005 《艰难的言说——汉语口语教学百年历程述评》,《课程·教材·教法》第3 期。
田小枫 2004 《对基础语文教育中口语交际教学的思考》,《中州大学学报》第4 期。
王 杰 2003 《近20 年来我国口语教学的反思和前瞻》,《四川教育学院学报》第3 期。
王瑞荣,刘玉惠,张永梅 2004 《小学生口语交际能力评价的思考与实践》,《当代教育科学》第23 期。
徐冰鸥,朱晓民 2006 《口语交际能力的构成及特征》,《语文建设》第9 期。
杨惠中,朱正才,方绪军 2011 《英语口语能力描述语因子分析及能力——制定语言能力等级量表实证研究》,《现代外语》第2 期。
翟志祥 2008 《浅谈口语交际能力的构成与培养》,《南京晓庄学院学报》第4 期。
张聪慧 2016 《新课程背景下中小学口语交际教学调查报告》,《河南教育学院学报》第4 期。
张明凯,范 蔚 2013 《小学语文能力研究二十年:回视与启示》,《天津教科院学报》第2 期。
朱卫东 2006 《构建三位立体的口语交际评价体系》,《教育科研论坛》第10 期。
朱作仁,李志强 1987 《论学生写作能力的结构要素及其发展阶段》,《教育评论》第4 期。
Bachman, Lyle. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, Lyle. 2000. Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing 17(1), 1-42.
Bernstein, Brail. 1971. Class, Code and Control: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language (Volume 1). London:Routledge Press.
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luoma, Sari. 2004. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, Brian. 2000. The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.

基金

本文是国家语委2014 年度课题“厦门城乡中小学生语言能力差异性分析”(YB125-129)的部分成果。作者衷心感谢匿名审稿专家提出的宝贵意见。

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/