《批判社会语言学研究方法:紧扣要害语言问题》述评

1.内克瓦比尔;2.何山华(译);3.方小兵(校)

语言战略研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (6) : 92-96.

欢迎访问《语言战略研究》官方网站!今天是
语言战略研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (6) : 92-96. DOI: 10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180609
语言战略研究

《批判社会语言学研究方法:紧扣要害语言问题》述评

  • 1.内克瓦比尔;2.何山华(译);3.方小兵(校)
作者信息 +

A Review of Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues that Matter

  • Ji?í Nekvapil
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文为新近出版的《批判社会语言学研究方法:紧扣要害语言问题》一书书评,原著作者为莫妮卡·赫勒(Monica Heller)、萨莉·派特凯侬(Sari Pietikäinen)和琼·普乔拉(Joan Pujolar),分别来自加拿大、芬兰以及加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)。从学科背景看,3 位作者均属广义的社会语言学领域,但其在探究语言与社会关系时所采取的路径,同时呈现出语言人类学和话语分析的特征。本文重点关注该书提出的批判社会语言学理论框架和方法论体系。值得赞赏的是,该书作者身体力行,将此框架体系应用于该书的研究之中。换言之,该书贯彻了作者提倡的反思性原则。此外,对于当今世界在语言、文化、社会和政治方面的多样性,作者很好地展现出了独特的敏锐度。本书采用民族志的视角,将研究过程分为5 个阶段,每个阶段通过递归机制和根茎原理相关联,这一做法值得肯定。

Abstract

This text reviews a recently published book Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues that Matter written by Canadian, Finnish and Catalan (Spain) authors (Monica Heller, Sari Pietikäinen and Joan Pujolar). From a disciplinary point of view all authors are sociolinguists in the broadest sense of the word, but when it comes to their approach to the relationship between language and society, we can also detect in their work features of linguistic anthropology and discourse analysis. In this review, I focus especially on the theoretical and methodological framework of critical sociolinguistics presented in the book. I appreciate the authors’ thorough approach in applying this framework even to their own work, in other words, their orientation to the principle of refl exivity. Further, I appreciate the authors’ exceptional sensitivity towards the linguistic,cultural, social and political diversity of the current world. I welcome the authors’ focus on ethnography and value their conceptualization of the research process as a fi ve-phase process, the individual phases of which are related through the principle of recursivity and rhizome.

关键词

批判社会语言学 / 研究方法 / 民族志 / 递归 / 根茎

Key words

critical sociolinguistics / research methods / ethnography / recursivity / rhizome

引用本文

导出引用
1.内克瓦比尔;2.何山华(译);3.方小兵(校). 《批判社会语言学研究方法:紧扣要害语言问题》述评[J]. 语言战略研究. 2018, 3(6): 92-96 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180609
Ji?í Nekvapil. A Review of Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues that Matter[J]. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning. 2018, 3(6): 92-96 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180609

参考文献

Baldauf, Richard B. and Obaidul M. Hamid. 2018. Language planning “schools” and their approaches and methodologies. In Lisa Fairbrother, Jiří Nekvapil, and Marián Sloboda (eds.), The Language Management Approach: A Focus on Research Methodology. Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien: Peter Lang.
Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. 1987. Introduction: Rhizome. In Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari (eds.), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [from French transl. by Brian Massumi]. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Singh, Rajendra (ed.). 1994. Towards a Critical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/