《语言战略研究》10年办刊实践,是出版社、学界和政府三方协同进行知识生产与管理的典型案例。本世纪初,国家语言文字工作部门的职能由管理向引导和服务的方向转换,语言学研究由语言本体向语言生活延伸,商务印书馆积极因应,拓展语言应用业务,这些都为《战略》创刊做了学术准备。《战略》以学界为知识生产引擎,组建核心团队,确立办刊理念与制度框架;以政府为治理导向锚点,确保学术研究紧密对接国家发展战略;以出版社为知识转化枢纽,强化顶层设计,保障核心环节高效执行。三方共同组成一个由知识逻辑和政治/治理逻辑双重驱动的知识生产共同体:学界是知识逻辑的“发动机”,政府是政治/治理逻辑的“方向盘”,出版社是以上两大逻辑的“转换器”或“集成平台”。它体现了一种有管理的知识生产体系,即学界经由出版社这一通道,在保持其自主性的同时,被深度整合嵌入国家治理的框架之中。
Drawing on a decade of editorial practice, this article examines
Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning (CJLPP) as a representative case of triadic co-production of knowledge and management involving a publisher, the academic community, and government agencies. It argues that the journal’s establishment was enabled by three converging shifts in the early twenty-first century: the reorientation of China’s national language authorities from direct administration to guidance and services; the expansion of linguistic inquiry from structural and theoretical linguistic approaches to the broader domain of language use in social life; and the publisher’s strategic move to develop applied language-related programs in response to these trends. The article further analyzes how the journal has been organized and governed through a functional division of labor. Academia serves as the primary engine of knowledge production, assembling a core editorial team and articulating editorial principles and institutional arrangements. The government functions as the anchor of governance orientation, helping ensure that scholarly agendas remain aligned with national development priorities. The publisher operates as the central hub for knowledge translation, strengthening top-level design and ensuring efficient execution across key editorial processes. Together, these actors constitute a knowledge-production community driven simultaneously by epistemic logics and political/governance logics: academia as the “engine”, government as the “steering wheel”, and the publisher as the “converter” or integrative platform. This configuration illustrates a form of managed knowledge production in which scholarly autonomy is maintained while being substantively embedded within a broader framework of state governance.