2025年7月27日 星期日
语言战略研究
  语言战略研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
当前语言认同研究的四大转变
方小兵
南京晓庄学院外国语学院 江苏 南京 211171
Paradigm Shifts in Language Identity Research
Fang Xiaobing

输出:BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 
当前,语言认同研究范式出现了4 个方面的转变:(1)从结构主义向建构主义转变,开始重视认同的建构过程、机制和驱动因素;(2)从关注语言态度等主观因素向语言行为倾向等客观因素转变,开始重视认同的实践性和社区层面的他者认同;(3)拒绝将语言认同视作一种静态身份标识,开始关注语言认同的动态流变和认同逆转现象;(4)从单一语言认同向双重语言认同的转向,开展了双母语现象的研究。针对当前语言认同研究之范式转变,本文从方法论层面提出两个研究建议。第一,在学术讨论中将“语言认同”作为学科专业术语使用并推进其理论建构,尽量避免用“语言与认同”来代替“语言认同”;同时,注意区分不同学科对“语言认同”概念的不同阐释。第二,学界尽快组织开展对语言认同评估的研究,提出既有普遍学理意义又具有可操作性的评价系统、评估指标和相关参数。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
方小兵
关键词 语言认同认同行为建构主义他者认同研究范式    
Abstract
The study of language identity has seen four major shifts in its research paradigms. The fi rst shift is the turn from the structuralist approach to the constructivist approach, where the process, mechanism, and motivation of identity construction are stressed. The second shift is the prioritization of objective elements (e.g. language behavior tendency) over subjective factors (e.g. language attitudes), highlighting the value of identifi cation practice and the community-level “otherness identification”. The third shift is the change from static identification to dynamic identification, which has raised concern about the fluidity and reversal of identity. The last shift is the change from unique identity to dual identity, especially in the case of the recognition and exploration of “dual mother tongues”. In view of the paradigm shifts in language identity research, this paper suggests that language identity research in China should make some changes accordingly. First, Yuyan Rentong (i.e. language identity), rather than Yuyan yu Rentong (i.e. language and identity), should be adopted as the single scholarly term in Chinese in order to serve as a consistent equivalent to the English term identity. Nevertheless, the different connotations of the term Yuyan Rentong in various disciplines deserve researchers’attention. Second, given the lack of recognized evaluation criteria for language identity,it is suggested that more importance should be attached to the assessment of language identification, and holistic evaluation systemsand effective indicators should be properly developed.
Key wordslanguage identity    identification behavior    constructivism    otherness identification    research paradigm
    
基金资助:

本文是2016 年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“ 联合国教科文组织语言规划观及其中国实践研究”(16YJA740009)及周有光语言文化学术研究项目“周有光‘语言与国家安全’思想研究”(ZGY001603)的阶段性成果。

作者简介: 方小兵,男,南京晓庄学院副教授,主要研究方向为语言规划学和术语学。
引用本文:   
方小兵. 当前语言认同研究的四大转变[J]. 语言战略研究, 2018, 3(3): 22-32.
Fang Xiaobing. Paradigm Shifts in Language Identity Research. , 2018, 3(3): 22-32.
版权所有 © 2015 商务印书馆有限公司《语言战略研究》编辑部
地址:北京市东城区王府井大街36号 邮编:100710
电话:010-65219060;65219062 传真:010-65523101 E-mail:yyzlyj@cp.com.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发