中国境内的混合语及语言混合的机制

徐 丹

语言战略研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 59-79.

欢迎访问《语言战略研究》官方网站!今天是
语言战略研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 59-79. DOI: 10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180206
语言战略研究

中国境内的混合语及语言混合的机制

  • 徐 丹
作者信息 +

Mixed Languages in China and Language Mixing Mechanism

  • Xu Dan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

文章分析了倒话、五屯话和唐汪话这3 个在中国境内被认为是混合语的语言。我们初步为识别混合语建立了一个量化的标准。我们提出,句法借贷较之词汇借贷是判定语言是否混合的更可靠的标准。如果某一个语言的句法借贷达到了45%,那么两个语言(借者和贷者)就会发生混合。如果是词汇借贷达到了同一个程度,语言不一定发生混合。语言混合的机制来自语言的外在因素。

Abstract

The article analyzes Daohua, Wutun and Tangwang languages, considered as “mixed languages” in China. We have established a preliminary quantitative criterion for identifying “mixed languages”. We propose that syntactic borrowing is a more reliable parameter than lexical borrowing for determining whether a language is mixed. If the syntactic borrowing in a language makes up 45%, the two languages (borrower and lender) begin to mix. If the lexical borrowing reaches the same level, the language may not necessarily be mixed. The language mixing mechanism comes from the external factors of languages.

关键词

混合语 / 词汇借贷 / 句法借贷 / 量化 / 机制

Key words

mixed language / lexical borrowing / syntactic borrowing / quantification / mechanism

引用本文

导出引用
徐 丹. 中国境内的混合语及语言混合的机制[J]. 语言战略研究. 2018, 3(2): 59-79 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180206
Xu Dan. Mixed Languages in China and Language Mixing Mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning. 2018, 3(2): 59-79 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20180206

参考文献

阿·伊布拉黑麦·陈元龙 2017 《关于唐汪话的几个问题》,《西北民族研究》第3期。
包萨仁 2007 《蒙古语族东乡语与汉语的接触研究》,北京大学博士学位论文。
陈保亚 1996 《论语言接触与语言联盟》,北京:语文出版社。
陈保亚 2005 《语言接触导致汉语方言分化的两种模式》,《北京大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)第2期。
陈乃雄 1982 《五屯话初探》,《民族语文》第1期。
陈乃雄 1986 《保安语和蒙古语》,呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社。
陈乃雄 1988 《五屯话音系》,《民族语文》第3期。
陈乃雄 1989 《五屯话的动词形态》,《民族语文》第6期。
陈乃雄 1990a 《保安语的演变轨迹》,《民族语文》第3期。
陈乃雄 1990b 《保安语的语音和词汇》,《西北民族研究》第1期。
陈宗振,努尔别克,赵相如等 1990 《中国突厥语族语言词汇集》,北京:民族出版社。
陈元龙(阿·伊布拉黑麦) 1985 《甘肃境内唐汪话记略》,《民族语文》第6期。
邓晓华,杨晓霞,高天俊 2015 《试论语言演化网络——以藏缅语为例》,《语言研究》第3期。
刘照雄 1981 《东乡语简志》,北京:民族出版社。
孟和达来,黄 行 1997 《蒙古语族和突厥语族关系词的词阶分布分析》,《民族语文》第1期。
芈一之,席元麟 1985 《同仁四寨子(五屯)土族历史考察》,载中国少数民族社会历史调查资料丛刊青海省编辑组 《青海土族社会历史调查》,西宁:青海人民出版社。
石毓智 2006 《语法化的动因与机制》,北京:北京大学出版社。
孙宏开,胡增益,黄 行 2007 《中国的语言》,北京:商务印书馆。
唐 智 2011 《唐汪社会史专题研究》,陕西师范大学硕士学位论文。
王 聪 2016 《汉语人称代词研究》,上海师范大学、法国东方语言文化学院博士学位论文。
王士元,沈钟伟 1992 《方言关系的计量表述》,《中国语文》第2期。
魏明章 1983 《汉族迁入今青海东部农业区的历史情况琐谈》,《青海社会学报》第6期。
席元麟等 1983 《同仁土族考察报告》(油印稿)。
徐 丹 2011 《唐汪话的格标记》,《中国语文》第2期。
徐 丹,傅京起 2011 《量词及其类型学考察》,《语言科学》第6期。
徐 丹,文少卿,谢小冬 2012 《东乡语和东乡人》,《民族语文》第3期。
徐 丹 2014 《唐汪话研究》,北京:民族出版社。
徐 丹 2016 《甘肃永登薛家湾邵句调查》,《民族语文》第2期。
杨永龙 2014 《青海民和甘沟话的多功能格标记“哈”》,《方言》第3期。
岩田礼 2012 《汉语方言解释地图(续集)》,东京:好文出版社。
意西微萨·阿错 2004 《倒话研究》,北京:民族出版社。
《张家村志》编修组 2004 《张家村志》,兰州:甘肃鑫统印务有限公司。
张梦翰,韦远诚 将出 《台语支系统发生模式及横向交流度量》,载徐丹,傅京起 《语言接触与语言变异》,北京:商务印书馆。
郑锦全 1994 《汉语方言沟通度的计算》,《中国语文》第1期。
周晨磊 将出 《甘青方言格标记“哈”的来源》。
Bakker, Peter and Maarten Mous. 1994. Mixed Languages. 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining (Studies in language and language use 13). Amsterdam: IFOTT.
Bickel, Balthasar and Johanna Nichols. 2005. Inclusive-exclusive as person vs. number categories worldwide. In Filimonova Elena (ed.), Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of the
Inclusive-exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Brown Cecil H., Eric W. Holman, and Søren Wichmann. 2013. Sound correspondences in the world’s languages. Language 89 (1),4–29.
Chen g, Chin-Chuan. 1996. Quantifying dialect mutual intelligibility. In James Huang and Audrey Li (eds.), New Horizons in Chinese Linguistics. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Djamouri, Redouane. 2015. Object positioning in Tangwang. In Cao Guangshun, Redouane Djamouri, and Alain Peyraube (eds.),Language in Contact in North China–Historical and Synchronic Studies. Paris: Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.
Field, Kenneth L. 1997. A Grammatical overview of Santa Mongolian. Ph.D dissertation at University of California, Santa Barbara.
Givón, Talmy. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 7,394–415.
Greenhill, Simon J. et al. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. PNAS, 1–8.
Herdan, Gustav. 1964. Quantitative Linguistics. Berlin/Heidelberg/London: Butterworth.
Janhunen, Juha, Marja Peltomaa, Erika Sandman, et al. 2008. Wutun. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
Lefort, Julie. 2012. Contact de langues dans le Nord-Ouest de la Chine: le cas de Dongxiang. Ph.D dissertation at EHESS, France.
Li, Charles N. 1985. Contact-induced semantic change and innovation. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical Semantics, Historical Word-formation. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton.
Matras, Yaron and Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31 (4), 829–865.
Matras,Yaron and Peter Bakker (eds.). 2003. The Mixed Language Debate. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Pagel, Mark, Quentin D. Atkinson, Andreea S. Calude, et al. 2013. Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. PNAS Early Edition, 1–6.
Peyraube, Alain. 2015. A comparative analysis of the case system in some Northwestern Sinitic languages. In Cao Guangshun,Redouane Djamouri, and Alain Peyraube (eds.), Language in Contact in North China–Historical and Synchronic Studies.Paris: Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archeology and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robin, Françoise. (Preprint) Parlons Amdo. (to appear by L’Harmattan.)
Sakel, Janette and Yaron Matras. 2008. Modelling contact-induced change in grammar. In Thomas Stolz and Dik Bakker (eds.),Aspects of Language Contact: New Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Findings with Special Focus on Romancisation Processes. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandman, Erika. 2012. Bonan grammatical features in Wutun Mandarin. In Lotta Jalara et al. (eds.), Per Urales ad Orientem. Iter polyphonicum multilingue. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Starostin, Sergei. 2000. Comparative-historical linguistics and lexicostatistics. In Renfrew et al. (eds.), Time Depth in Historical Linguistics. McDonald Institute for Archaeological
Research: Oxford Publishing Press.
Stolz, Thomas. 2003. Not quite the right mixture: Chamorro and Malti as candidates for the status of mixed language. In Yaron Matras and Peter Bakker (eds.), The Mixed Language Debate. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Swadesh, Morris. 1955. Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 21 (2),121–137.
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language Contact–An Introduction. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Thomason, Sarah G. 2003. Social factors and linguistic processes in the emergence of stable mixed languages. In Yaron Matras and Peter Bakker (eds.), The Mixed Language Debate. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thomason, Sarah G. 2007. Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Language Contact 1, 41–62.
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley/Los Angeles:University of California Press.
Tournadre, Nicolas and Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manuel de tibétain standard. Paris: L’Asiathèque.
Wang, Chuanchao, Ling-Xiang Wang, Rukesh Shrestha, et al. 2014. Genetic structure of Qiangic populations residing in the Western Sichuan corridor. PLOS One 9 (8), 1–14.
Wang, S-Y. William. 1994. Glottochronology, lexicostatistics, and other numerical methods. In R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Wichmann, Søren, Eric W. Holman. 2009. Temporal Stability of Linguistic Typological Features. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Wichmann, Søren, Eric W. Holman, and Cecil H. Brown (eds.). 2016. The ASJP Database (version 17). http://asjp.clld.org/.
Xu, Dan. 2015. Sinitic languages of Northwest China: Where did their case marking come from? In Cao Guangshun, Redouane
Djamouri, and Alain Peyraube (eds.), Language in Contact in North China–Historical and Synchronic Studies. Paris: Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.
Xu Dan. 2017. The Tangwang Language–An Interdisciplinary Case Study in Northwest China. Cham: Springer.
Xu, Dan and Wen Shaoqing. 2017. Formation of a “mixed language” in Northwest China–The case of Tangwang. In Xu Dan and Li Hui (eds.), Language and Gene in Northwestern China. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Xu Dan and Li Hui (eds.). 2017. Languages and Genes in Northwestern China and Adjacent Regions. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Zhu, Yongzhong, Üjiyediin Chuluu, Keith Slater, et al. 1997. Gangou Chinese dialect–A comparative study of a strongly altaicized Chinese dialect and its Mongolic neighbor. Anthropos 92, 433–450.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/