弗兰德与荷兰手语标准化对比研究

林 皓

语言战略研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 83-89.

欢迎访问《语言战略研究》官方网站!今天是
语言战略研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 83-89. DOI: 10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20190208
语言战略研究

弗兰德与荷兰手语标准化对比研究

  • 林 皓
作者信息 +

A Comparative Analysis of Standardization Strategies Between Flemish and Netherland Sign Languages

  • Lin Hao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

语言标准化作为本体规划基本内容,也是语言政策与规划重点之一。国家出于各种目的会对该国手语实施标准化(或者统一化),促成通用语的形成。然而,手语这门语言较为特殊,作为视觉语言,以手眼为沟通媒介,独立并区别于相应所在国家的有声语言及文字。因此应用于口语标准化的方式并不一定适用于手语。弗兰德和荷兰手语文化背景及标准化时间都较为相近,但弗兰德手语标准化归于失败,荷兰手语标准化却获得成功。本文试通过比较弗兰德和荷兰手语标准化活动,分析两者成败原因,探寻手语标准化的规律,以期对我国通用手语的实施有所启示。

Abstract

Language standardization as an essential part of language corpus planning plays a key role in language policy. Out of various motives the nation makes policy to standardize the national sign language. However, sign language is mediated via visual-manual channel in contrast with the aural-audio modality of the spoken language, independent of the spoken and written languages used in the respective countries. Therefore, the normal principles applied in the standardization of spoken languages do not always work in dealing with sign languages. VGT and NGT share many in common while the former failed and the latter succeeded in standardization. The paper attempts to compare and analyze the two cases in order to find out the causes and more preferred models and strategies in sign language standardization.

关键词

标准化 / 手语 / 荷兰手语 / 弗兰德手语

Key words

standardization / sign language / NGT / VGT

引用本文

导出引用
林 皓. 弗兰德与荷兰手语标准化对比研究[J]. 语言战略研究. 2019, 4(2): 83-89 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20190208
Lin Hao. A Comparative Analysis of Standardization Strategies Between Flemish and Netherland Sign Languages[J]. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning. 2019, 4(2): 83-89 https://doi.org/10.19689/j.cnki.cn10-1361/h.20190208

基金

本文系教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目《世界语言政策综合资源库建设及比较研究》(15JZD047)的阶段性成果。

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/