汉语国际传播的理论维度

卢德平

语言战略研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4) : 42-51.

欢迎访问《语言战略研究》官方网站!今天是
语言战略研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4) : 42-51.
语言战略研究

汉语国际传播的理论维度

  • 卢德平
作者信息 +

The Theoretic Dimensions of Chinese Language International Spread

  • Lu Deping
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

理想或成功的汉语国际传播,实质是具有厚度的传播过程文本的生产和再生产,而每一次生产和再生产,都需要以这种文本的内在连贯性、一致性、统一性为重要条件。汉语国际传播过程中的各种解体力量都程度不同地威胁到一种连贯、一致、统一的传播过程文本的形成,从而造成传播不成功的结果。但是,这种传播文本的非连贯性和不一致性并非毫无意义,也不只是存在消极作用。这些文本解体力量对于对话者达成理解和共识所需要的文本连贯性和一致性构成了障碍,而这种障碍本身蕴含着克服障碍的意义,激发起追求互动新奇的跨文化传播实践者的对话兴趣,使得汉语国际传播本身拥有母语共同体成员之间日常互动实践所不具有的特殊意义。汉语母语携带者与对象国社会成员之间的互动在各类交际实践中障碍最多,共识最难达成,但也是一种具有张力和新奇的交流,在很多情况下也最容易转变为意义丰富、魅力无穷的交流。

Abstract

This article attempts to address the issues concerning Chinese language overseas spread from a theoretic perspective. An idealized or successful Chinese international communication ought to be taken as production and reproduction of a communicative process text, which has a complex set of meaningful layers rather than a linear mode of speech. Each textual production and reproduction is regulated or even controlled largely by its immanent consistency, coherency and unity. However, a variety of deconstructive factors can pose a threat to the formation of this consistent, coherent and unitary text of communicative process, to the extent that it may lead to an unsuccessful communication. Nonetheless, such inconsistency and incoherency of communicative text are by no means meaningless or negative. Although these deconstructive forces are barriers to a mutual understanding and for consensus to be reached between participants of a dialogue, they are bound to be necessary for overcoming the barriers, and to stimulate an urge to converse across cultures and communities. This cross-cultural communicative situation therefore has a special signifi cance different from what one may appreciate in a mother tongue setting. Carriers of Chinese as a mother tongue may face toughest barriers and lowest agreement in communicating with an alien partner, but also a tensest and most astonishing communication, which is likely to be transformed into a meaningful and attractive communication.

关键词

汉语国际传播 / 社会互动 / 传播方式 / 线性语言 / 厚度文本

Key words

Chinese international communication / social interaction / communicative mode / linear language / thick text

引用本文

导出引用
卢德平. 汉语国际传播的理论维度[J]. 语言战略研究. 2016, 1(4): 42-51
Lu Deping. The Theoretic Dimensions of Chinese Language International Spread[J]. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning. 2016, 1(4): 42-51

参考文献

江 怡 2016 《略论语言与价值的关系》,《北京师范大学学报》第2 期。
李宇明 2012 《当代中国语言生活中的问题》,《中国社会科学》第9 期。
李宇明 2016 《语言生活与语言生活研究》,《语言战略研究》第3 期。
卢德平 2016 《汉语国际传播的推拉因素:一个框架性思考》,《新疆师范大学学报》第1 期。
王建勤 2016 《“一带一路”与汉语传播:历史思考、现实机遇与战略规划》,《语言战略研究》第2 期。
俞可平 1988 《论当代中国政治沟通的基本特征及其存在的主要问题》,《政治学研究》第3 期。
Akmajian, Adrian, Richard A. Demers, Ann K. Farmer, and Robert M. Harnish. 2001. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image Music Text. London: Fontana Press.
Berger, Peter Ludwig and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise of Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Ferguson, Charles Albert. 1993. The Language Factor in National Development. Anthropological Linguistics 35(1), 124-129.
Fishman, Joshua Aaron. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method. 2nd Revised Edition. London: Continuum Publishing Group.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northwestern University Press.
Gumperz, John Joseph. 1962. Types of Linguistic Communities. Anthropological Linguistics 4(1), 28-40.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1998. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge: MIT press.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1999. Alterity and Transcendence. London:The Athlone Press.
Mead, George Herbert. 1972. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago:The University Of Chicago Press.
Nichols, Johanna. 1997. Modeling Ancient Population Structures and Movement in Linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26, 359-384.
Nichols, Johanna. 2008. Language Spread Rates and Prehistoric American Migration Rates. Current Anthropology 49(6),1109-1117.
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers I. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.London: Syndics of the Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford:Basil Blackwell Ltd.

基金

教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“‘一带一路’关联国主要社会场域汉语传播的推拉因素及其对传播过程影响的研究”(15JJD740005)。

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/